There are truly beautiful passages, such as this one: Yes, it's well written - that is, the dialogue is expertly handled.

I'm even more troubled by the fact that I haven't seen anyone else bring up what bothers me about this play. I hate to rate this so low when it seems that the only people who do so are those forced to read it by a cruel teacher. WIth an introduction by Christopher Bigsby. A political policy is equated with moral right, and opposition to it with diabolical malevolence.' is given an inhumane overlay, which then justifies the abrogation of all normally applied customs of civilized behavior. Within the text itself, Miller contemplates the parallels, writing, 'Political opposition. Written in 1953, The Crucible is a mirror Miller uses to reflect the anti-communist hysteria inspired by Senator Joseph McCarthy's 'witch-hunts' in the United States. The ruthlessness of the prosecutors and the eagerness of neighbor to testify against neighbor brilliantly illuminates the destructive power of socially sanctioned violence. In the rigid theocracy of Salem, rumors that women are practicing witchcraft galvanize the town's most basic fears and suspicions and when a young girl accuses Elizabeth Proctor of being a witch, self-righteous church leaders and townspeople insist that Elizabeth be brought to trial. Based on historical people and real events, Miller's drama is a searing portrait of a community engulfed by hysteria.

'I believe that the reader will discover here the essential nature of one of the strangest and most awful chapters in human history,' Arthur Miller wrote of his classic play about the witch-hunts and trials in seventeenth-century Salem, Massachusetts.

The crucible a play in four acts